This is the next to the last post I am going to make before tomorrow’s election. In this post I would like to take a step back from the election and try to look at things from a broader perspective. Whenever I have needed to do this in my personal life I have gone back to a book that I read in college in the early 1970s, The Octopus by Frank Norris. Here is a very high level summary of the book from Google books.
The Octopus is about wheat growers who are in conflict with a railroad company during late 19th century California. The railroad company, controlling the local newspaper, state legislature and the land prove to be a tough force for the local wheat growers to fight against.
It is not an easy read, and is not a happy book by any means, but the last paragraph of the book made it all worthwhile for me.
Falseness dies; injustice and oppression in the end of everything fade and vanish away. Greed, cruelty, selfishness, and inhumanity are short-lived; the individual suffers, but the race goes on. Annixter dies, but in a far distant corner of the world a thousand lives are saved. The larger view always and through all shams, all wickednesses, discovers the Truth that will, in the end, prevail, and all things, surely, inevitably, resistlessly work together for good.
Those words continue to ring true to me. I firmly believe that good will always eventually triumph over evil. It may not always happen in the timeframe that we would like, but eventually it happens. Many times individuals have to suffer, but in the end, everything works together for good. These are the words I would like to leave you with tonight.
None of us know for sure what the results of tomorrow’s election will be but whatever the results this great country will continue to move forward and the good in the country will eventually prevail, even if it doesn’t happen tomorrow.
*******************************************
If you think you might be interested in reading The Octopus, I encourage you to do it! Here is what Sarah Payok had to say about the book in her review on goodbooks.com.
…it is a story about wrongs against humanity and he wrote it for the masses. There is nothing privileged about this book. It is a warning against the concentration of power and the risks all people run if they lose sight of their morals. This book does not preach but it would be hard to miss to message.
OK….maybe this book is about tomorrow’s election after all.
No…..I’m not talking about “Do unto others as you would have them do unto you.” The Republican Golden rule is more straight forward and to the point “The men with the gold make the rules!”
Mitt Romney and his supporters are the men with the gold and if they get voted into office they will be ones that will make the rules. I say “they” because the rich supporters of Mitt Romney (the 1%) are not donating the outrageous sums of money (come on $20,000,000 from one man alone!) shown below out of the goodness of their hearts. They are doing so they can be the ones (i.e. the 1%) making the rules that that the remainder of us (the 99%) have to abide by. I guarantee you that these rules will help the 1% at the expense of the 99%.
Checkout the following information I extracted from an article on today’s Huffington Post to see what I mean. After that, you have all you need to know about voting.
Full list of Forbes 400 donors to Romney, the RNC and Restore Our Future (a Republican super PAC).
Name
Net Worth
Source
Romney for President
RNC
Restore Our Future
David Koch
$31 B
diversified
$5,000
$4,200
Charles Koch
$31 B
diversified
$30,800
Jim Walton
$26.8 B
Wal-Mart
$5,000
$200,000
Alice Walton
$26.3 B
Wal-Mart
$2,500
$200,000
Sheldon Adelson
$20.5 B
casinos
$5,000
$30,800
$20,000,000
Jacqueline Mars
$17 B
candy
$5,000
$23,500
Steve Ballmer
$15.9 B
Microsoft
$15,000
Carl Icahn
$14.8 B
leveraged buyouts
$2,500
Phil Knight
$13.1 B
Nike
$5,000
$30,800
Donald Bren
$13 B
real estate
$5,000
$30,800
Len Blavatnik
$12.5 B
diversified
$2,500
Ronald Perelman
$12 B
leveraged buyouts
$3,000
Abigail Johnson
$11.8 B
money management
$5,000
$30,800
John Paulson
$11 B
hedge funds
$5,000
$30,800
$1,000,000
Jack Taylor
$11 B
Enterprise Rent-A-Car
$5,000
$10,000
Harold Hamm
$9.7 B
oil & gas
$2,500
$30,800
$985,000
Richard Kinder
$9.4 B
pipelines
$5,000
$6,700
Andrew Beal
$8.4 B
banks, real estate
$200,000
Philip Anschutz
$7.6 B
investments
$30,800
James Goodnight
$7.3 B
software
$5,000
$30,800
Harold Simmons
$7.1 B
investments
$2,500
$1,200,000
Ira Rennert
$6.5 B
investments
$5,000
$20,000
$1,000,000
John Malone
$5.6 B
cable television
$5,000
$30,800
David Tepper
$5.5 B
hedge funds
$5,000
$30,800
$375,000
Jeffrey Hildebrand
$5.5 B
oil
$2,500
$200,000
Jim Kennedy
$5.4 B
media
$5,000
$30,800
Stephen Schwarzman
$5.2 B
private equity
$5,000
$30,800
Dennis Washington
$5.2 B
construction, mining
$5,000
$50,000
Ray Lee Hunt
$5.2 B
oil, real estate
$5,000
$30,800
Richard LeFrak
$5.2 B
real estate
$5,000
$25,000
Richard DeVos
$5.1 B
Amway
$5,000
$30,800
Robert Rowling
$4.9 B
investments
$5,000
$24,200
$100,000
Hank Meijer
$4.9 B
supermarkets
$5,000
$28,300
Charles Johnson
$4.7 B
Money Management
$5,000
$30,800
$50,000
Scott Duncan
$4.7 B
pipelines
$2,250
Rupert Johnson Jr.
$4.6 B
money management
$5,000
$20,000
Thomas Peterffy
$4.6 B
discount brokerage
$5,000
$30,800
Trevor Rees-Jones
$4.5 B
oil & Gas
$5,000
$30,800
$100,000
Stephen Ross
$4.4 B
real estate
$5,000
$20,800
$100,000
Leslie Wexner
$4.4 B
retail
$5,000
$250,000
Bruce Kovner
$4.3 B
hedge funds
$5,000
$23,300
$1,000,000
Leonard Stern
$4.2 B
real estate
$2,500
S. Truett Cathy
$4.2 B
Chick-fil-A
$2,500
Henry Kravis
$4 B
leveraged buyouts
$5,000
$30,800
$200,000
Thomas Frist Jr.
$4 B
health care
$2,500
Barbara Gage
$4 B
hotels, restaurants
$500
William Koch
$4 B
oil, investments
$4,000,000
Sam Zell
$3.8 B
real estate, private equity
$2,500
$9,800
$180,000
Charles Schwab
$3.7 B
discount brokerage
$5,000
$30,800
$125,000
George Roberts
$3.7 B
leveraged buyouts
$5,000
$30,800
Edward Roski Jr.
$3.7 B
real estate
$3,700
$30,800
Leon Black
$3.5 B
private equity
$5,000
$30,800
Tom Love
$3.5 B
retail & gas stations
$5,000
$7,500
Judy Love
$3.5 B
retail & gas stations
$5,000
$7,500
Edward Lampert
$3.2 B
hedge funds
$2,500
Ken Griffin
$3.1 B
hedge funds
$5,000
$30,800
$1,550,000
Donald Trump
$3.1 B
Television, Real Estate
$5,000
$30,800
Whitney MacMillan
$3 B
Cargill Inc.
$3,000
Charles Dolan
$3 B
cable television
$5,000
$20,800
John Catsimatidis
$3 B
oil, real estate, supermarkets
$5,000
$30,800
Terrence Pegula
$3 B
natural gas
$5,000
$30,800
Jerry Speyer
$3 B
real estate
$5,000
$30,800
Archie Emmerson
$3 B
timberland, lumber mills
$5,000
$30,000
Riley Bechtel
$2.9 B
engineering, construction
$5,000
$7,500
Stephen Bechtel Jr.
$2.9 B
engineering, construction
$5,000
$30,000
Diane Hendricks
$2.9 B
roofing
$5,000
$30,800
Doris Fisher
$2.9 B
Gap
$2,500
Warren Stephens
$2.7 B
investment banking
$2,500
$25,500
$500,000
Stanley Druckenmiller
$2.7 B
hedge funds
$5,000
Bernard Marcus
$2.7 B
Home Depot
$5,000
$30,800
$20,000
Helen Johnson-Leipold
$2.7 B
SC Johnson & Sons
$2,500
Michael Ilitch
$2.7 B
pizza
$5,000
$30,800
Marian Ilitch
$2.7 B
pizza
$5,000
$30,800
Jeremy Jacobs Sr.
$2.7 B
sports concessions
$5,000
$30,800
Jerry Jones
$2.7 B
Dallas Cowboys
$2,500
Julian Robertson Jr.
$2.6 B
hedge funds
$5,000
$30,800
$2,250,000
Herbert Kohler Jr.
$2.6 B
plumbing fixtures
$5,000
$30,800
David Sun
$2.6 B
computer hardware
$2,500
Phillip Ruffin
$2.5 B
casinos, real estate
$5,000
$30,800
Anthony Pritzker
$2.5 B
hotels, investments
$5,000
$30,800
Shahid Khan
$2.5 B
auto parts
$5,000
$30,800
Randal Kirk
$2.4 B
pharmaceuticals
$5,000
$25,600
Phillip Frost
$2.4 B
pharmaceuticals
$5,000
$30,800
H. Wayne Huizenga
$2.4 B
investments
$2,500
$30,800
A. Jerrold Perenchio
$2.4 B
television
$5,000
$1,500,000
Igor Olenicoff
$2.4 B
real estate
$1,000
Mary Malone
$2.4 B
Campbell Soup
$1,000
Daniel Och
$2.3 B
hedge funds
$2,500
Wilbur Ross Jr.
$2.3 B
investments
$5,000
$30,800
$100,000
John Fisher
$2.3 B
Gap
$5,000
Stewart Resnick
$2.2 B
agriculture, water
$5,000
$30,800
Leon Cooperman
$2.2 B
hedge funds
$5,000
$30,800
Thomas Pritzker
$2.2 B
hotels, investments
$2,500
Henry Hillman
$2.2 B
investments
$5,000
$30,800
Herbert Simon
$2.2 B
real estate
$5,000
$22,500
William Wrigley Jr.
$2.2 B
chewing gum
$2,500
Anita Zucker
$2.1 B
chemicals
$5,000
$5,000
Walter Scott Jr.
$2.1 B
construction, telecom
$5,000
$30,800
Stanley Hubbard
$2.1 B
DirecTV
$2,500
$30,800
Jim Davis
$2.1 B
New Balance
$5,000
$1,000,000
Herbert Allen Jr.
$2 B
investment banking
$5,000
J. Christopher Reyes
$2 B
food distribution
$2,500
$100,000
Edward Bass
$2 B
oil, investments
$5,000
$30,000
Lee Bass
$2 B
oil, investments
$5,000
Richard Peery
$2 B
real estate
$5,000
$30,800
Andrew Cherng
$2 B
Panda Restaurant Group
$3,750
Peggy Cherng
$2 B
Panda Restaurant Group
$3,750
Daniel D’Aniello
$1.9 B
leveraged buyouts
$2,500
Daniel Gilbert
$1.9 B
Quicken Loans
$5,000
$6,700
Alec Gores
$1.9 B
private equity
$5,000
Michael Jaharis
$1.9 B
pharmaceuticals
$2,500
$30,800
Richard Marriott
$1.9 B
hotels
$5,000
$28,800
$1,000,000
George Argyros
$1.9 B
real estate, investments
$5,000
$30,800
Clayton Mathile
$1.9 B
pet food
$2,500
$30,800
Bennett Dorrance
$1.9 B
Campbell Soup
$5,000
$5,000
B. Wayne Hughes
$1.9 B
self storage
$2,500
Dean White
$1.8 B
billboards, hotels
$5,000
$30,800
Ken Fisher
$1.8 B
money management
$2,500
Robert McNair
$1.8 B
energy, sports
$5,000
$1,000,000
Drayton McLane Jr.
$1.8 B
Wal-Mart, logistics
$250,000
Leandro Rizzuto
$1.8 B
consumer products
$2,500
Frederick Smith
$1.8 B
FedEx
$5,000
Thomas Siebel
$1.8 B
business software
$5,000
$25,800
Jonathan Nelson
$1.7 B
leveraged buyouts
$2,500
Glenn Dubin
$1.7 B
hedge funds
$5,000
$2,500
Meg Whitman
$1.7 B
eBay
$100,000
Joshua Harris
$1.6 B
private equity
$5,000
$30,800
Stewart Rahr
$1.6 B
drug distribution
$1,000
Bill Marriott Jr.
$1.6 B
hotels
$4,100
$30,800
$1,000,000
Kenneth Langone
$1.6 B
investments
$2,500
Norman Braman
$1.6 B
art, car dealerships
$5,000
$25,800
Marc Rowan
$1.5 B
private equity
$2,500
$220,000
Thomas Kaplan
$1.5 B
Investments
$5,000
$30,800
$100,000
James Pritzker
$1.5 B
hotels, investments
$4,900
$30,800
Richard Schulze
$1.5 B
Best Buy
$2,500
$30,800
Bob Parsons
$1.5 B
web hosting
$1,000,000
Craig McCaw
$1.5 B
telecom
$5,000
$5,000
James Dinan
$1.4 B
hedge funds
$2,500
Michael Price
$1.4 B
investments
$5,000
$20,000
Farris Wilks
$1.4 B
natural gas
$5,000
$20,000
Henry Ross Perot Jr.
$1.4 B
computer services, real estate
$3,200
Richard Hayne
$1.4 B
Urban Outfitters
$5,000
$30,800
Scott Cook
$1.4 B
Intuit
$5,000
$30,800
Louis Bacon
$1.3 B
hedge funds
$500,000
Daniel Loeb
$1.3 B
hedge Funds
$2,500
$30,800
Richard Scaife
$1.3 B
investments
$5,000
$30,800
$82,500
Billy Joe McCombs
$1.3 B
real estate, oil, cars
$5,000
$50,000
Mark Stevens
$1.2 B
venture capital
$2,500
$30,800
Henry Swieca
$1.2 B
hedge funds
$5,000
$22,500
Richard Chilton Jr
$1.2 B
hedge funds
$5,000
$30,800
Patrick Ryan
$1.2 B
insurance
$5,000
$30,800
Nelson Peltz
$1.2 B
investments
$5,000
$30,800
$50,000
C. Dean Metropoulos
$1.2 B
investments
$30,800
Christopher Cline
$1.2 B
coal
$5,000
$30,800
T. Boone Pickens
$1.2 B
oil & gas, investments
$5,000
$30,800
Jimmy Haslam
$1.2 B
retail
$5,000
$30,000
Bruce Nordstrom
$1.2 B
Retailing
$5,000
Tom Benson
$1.2 B
New Orleans Saints
$5,000
$30,800
James Clark
$1.2 B
Netscape
$5,000
$3,000
Kenny Troutt
$1.2 B
telecommunications
$5,000
$30,800
Alexander Rovt
$1.15 B
fertilizer, real estate
$500
Paul Singer
$1.1 B
hedge funds
$5,000
$30,800
$1,000,000
George Joseph
$1.1 B
insurance
$2,500
Dan Snyder
$1.1 B
Washington Redskins
$5,000
$30,800
(Sources: Forbes.com and Federal Election Commission.)
If their man [i.e Mitt Romney] wins election next Tuesday, these wealthy contributors are poised to have his ear.
Much of Romney’s platform caters directly to the policies they desire. Further tax cuts for upper incomes, capital gains, interest and dividends; the elimination of taxes on estate transfers; lower corporate tax rates; and the implementation of a territorial tax system all favor the wealthy over the working and middle classes.
“The initial effect would be to give very large tax cuts to wealthy people — and that’s clear — and to corporations which they own,” said Bob McIntyre, president of Citizens for Tax Justice.
The Romney policies would disproportionately aid financial-sector billionaires, who make most of their money through capital gains and carried interest. Fifty-eight members of the Forbes 400 who have supported Romney hail from the financial and investments industries. They have given a total of $12.9 million to help the Republican candidate.
Romney’s policies are also very favorable to the fossil fuel industry, including reduced regulation, cuts in the Environmental Protection Agency’s budget and more areas open to drilling. Oil billionaire Harold Hamm, one of Romney’s top energy advisers and a major donor to both the Romney campaign and Restore Our Future, would profit handsomely from Romney’s energy agenda.
Then there’s casino magnate Sheldon Adelson, the largest donor to Romney’s efforts. Adelson, who has given $20 million to Restore Our Future and $35,800 to Romney and the RNC, has made it clear that he opposes unions, supports lower taxes and Israel’s right-wing government, and wants an investigation into his company’s China business to be quashed.
This commandment is the core of the Republican strategy for this year’s campaign. There are too many examples to focus on each one so let’s just focus on the most recent one….Republican lies about the auto industry. Sure, you can see why they are using this approach….Mitt Romney’s “let them go bankrupt” approach to saving the auto industry is not a winning position. So all the Republican’s can do is lie. So tell me, are you willing to vote for a presidential candidate that has zero integrity? I can tell you that I am not!
Let’s start with at the beginning, here is Romney’s position, Romney’s prediction of the consequences of the bailout supported by President Obama, and the reality of what has has occurred based on the bailout.
Here is the Romney ad running in Ohio that is full of lies. The first of the lies is that President took made the companies go bankrupt . Of course it was Romney who wanted to do this and it was President Obama that bailed them out. The second lie is that Chrysler was moving Jeep production to China.
The following article captures Chrysler’s response to the second lie.
***************************************
Chrysler CEO Calls Romney Jeep Claim ‘Inaccurate’
For a candidate pledged to help businesses large and small succeed, Mitt Romney sure is getting a cool reception from top executives at Chrysler.
Sergio Marchionne, the company’s CEO, felt compelled to send a company-wide email to reassure workers that assertions made by the Republican presidential candidate both in a campaign appearance and in radio and television advertisements are “inaccurate.””I feel obliged to unambiguously restate our position: Jeep production will not be moved from the United States to China,” he wrote, adding that the company was planning on more investment in manufacturing and jobs in the American Midwest, including the crucial presidential swing state of Ohio.
Romney commented while campaigning last week that he had read news reports saying Chrysler would be cutting American jobs in favor of manufacturing Jeeps overseas.
Marchionne said it is true that the company is ramping up overseas manufacturing, but as additional capacity to feed growing demand in Chinese markets, not to replace American jobs.
“Jeep assembly lines will remain in operation in the United States and will constitute the backbone of the brand,” he said. “It is inaccurate to suggest anything different.”
The back-and-forth, held just one week before Election Day, may prove a pivotal moment.
President Barack Obama and Romney are virtually tied in national polling, but Obama has a slight edge in most Ohio surveys, likely buoyed by positive reviews of his oversight of the auto-industry bailout viewed as critical to the region.
The Buckeye State is a near must-win for Romney, as no Republican has been elected to the White House without winning Ohio. Scrutiny of the electoral map reveals even if Romney were to run the table and win other battleground states Florida, Virginia, North Carolina, Colorado, New Hampshire, and Iowa, he still wouldn’t win the 270 votes necessary without taking Ohio.
Obama campaign officials have called Romney’s willingness to mislead a “desperate” attempt to win.
“It reeks of desperation because that’s what it is,” said Jim Messina, Obama’s campaign manager in a media call on Monday.
The Ohio press has extensively covered the back-and-forth, with the Cleveland Plain Dealer editorializing that the ad is “a masterpiece of misdirection.”
The Romney campaign also made news Tuesday when it announced that it was buying television advertising time in Pennsylvania, traditionally a swing state but one that has been largely off the table this cycle due to Obama’s consistent lead in polling there. An average of statewide polling has Obama up by 4.7 percentage points, according to RealClearPolitics.com. The GOP candidate’s campaign is also going to stump in Minnesota, another state thought to be firmly in the Democrat’s corner throughout the campaign.
“With one week to go, and 96 percent of the vote on the table on Election Day in Pennsylvania, this expansion of the electoral map demonstrates that Gov. Romney’s momentum has jumped containment from the usual target states and has spread to deeper blue states that Chicago never anticipated defending,” wrote Rich Beeson, Romney’s political director, in a memo on the campaign website.
He said the campaign is flush with cash and ready to make a super-sized final push.
“As a campaign we will put more resources into the target states in the final week, than previous GOP campaigns have been able to do in the final 10 weeks,” Beeson said. “The Romney campaign has the resources to expand the map in ways that weren’t possible in past cycles (without reducing any effort in any other target state).”
The Obama campaign, however, argues this expansion into states where Romney hasn’t been spending time or resources previously is an acknowledgement they aren’t gaining the necessary traction in Ohio and in other battlegrounds.
“The Romney campaign has found itself with a tremendously narrow and improbable path to 270 electoral votes,” said Messina, in a statement distributed by the Obama campaign. “Now, like Republicans did in 2008, they are throwing money at states where they never built an organization and have been losing for two years. Let’s be very clear, the Romney campaign and its allies decision to go up with advertising in Michigan, Pennsylvania and Minnesota is a decision made out of weakness, not strength.”
Messina said it’s clear that Obama has a “significant” early vote advantage and that Romney’s momentum gained from his debate performance at the beginning of the month has stalled.
“Gov. Romney has not been able to put away a single battleground state,” he said. “In fact, as polls in the past day have showed the candidates tied in North Carolina, Republicans have raced to increase their television advertising there. Voters who haven’t heard from the Romney campaign in two years will see this desperation for what it is.”
Both campaigns suspended official campaigning by Romney and Obama on Monday and Tuesday due to Hurricane Sandy. Romney did hold what the campaign billed as a “storm relief” event with supporters in Ohio, gathering canned goods and other items and Obama made a stop by the American Red Cross headquarters in Washington. Obama will travel to New Jersey on Wednesday where he will survey storm damage with Republican Gov. Chris Christie, while Romney has a full slate of campaign events scheduled in Florida. Christie, a top Romney surrogate who delivered the keynote address at the Republican National Convention this year, has already offered praise for Obama’s leadership on Sandy relief efforts.
*********************************************
Did the Romney campaign apologize for the ad……no way. They doubled down on their lies. Here is a news report about their second ad with even more flagrant lies.
*********************************************
Finally, Rachel Maddow, in her own unique way, sets the record straight and call out Romney and the Republicans for what they are…..serial liars.
I think the headline says it all but let me put it another way……the Republicans are “Robin Hood in Reverse”. What does that mean….It means that the Romney/Ryan budget is all about budget cuts that will take from the poor and give the savings to the rich. Romney and Ryan still refuse to release any details on their budget (I understand….if they said what they were really planning no one would vote for them!) but the concept above is clear based on the Ryan budget that Romney has embraced. If this is the philosophy you want for the US Government then the Romney/Ryan ticket is for you! It is definitely not for me……
Bruce Springsteen said it best, in the US we take care of our own!
Watch this video for a lot of great details on the topic above, then watch Bruce perform We Take Care Of Our Own. Please look for a special message from me before the Bruce video!
I firmly believe that in the US we do take care of our own. With that in mind, most of you probably know that a devastating storm named Sandy hit the northeast US this week and cause lots of damage and loss of life.
People are hurting and I would like to encourage everyone to help to the extent that you can. A donation to the Red Cross (www.redcross.org) will help make sure that that help quickly gets to the people who need it the most. Thanks for your consideration.
Here is a great post from liberalvaluesblog.com to make my closing argument on this Republican Commandment. The post is based on comments made during the Republican primaries.
I have made it a point to try to keep religion out of political posts on this blog. I don’t care about anyone’s religion, including Mitt Romney’s! Religious freedom is why this country was founded and I ask you to think about that as you read the article below.
Santorum Upset That Obama Agenda Not Based On Bible
February 19, 2012 — Ron Chusid
In a post yesterday I contrasted the false conservative narrative that liberals support a big government to impose their views upon others with the actual fact that a large segment of the conservative movement actually does see the role of government as imposing their religious views on the country. Rick Santorum repeatedly demonstrates this, doing so again yesterday in attacking Obama for having an agenda which is not “based on Bible.”
Newt Gingrich has made similar arguments with his attacks on Obama as a “secular socialist.” (Besides being wrong in seeing secular as undesirable, he is wrong in calling Obama a socialist. Gingrich is using the new conservative definition of socialism as supporting a few percentage point increase in the marginal tax rate of multimillionaires and lower tax rates on the middle class, which has nothing to do with any conventional definition of the term.) Ron Paul has also shown a preference for theocracy, while Mitt Romney is willing to take multiple positions on the issue.
Contrast Santorum and Gingrich with a previous Catholic candidate for president, John F. Kennedy:
I believe in an America that is officially neither Catholic, Protestant nor Jewish, where no public official either requests or accept instructions on public policy from the Pope, the National Council of Churches or any other ecclesiastical source; where no religious body seeks to impose its will directly or indirectly upon the general populace or the public acts of its officials, and where religious liberty is so indivisible that an act against one church is treated as an act against all.
John Kennedy and Barack Obama are both following in the tradition of the Founding Fathers who understood the importance of creating a secular republic with separation of church and state. Nobody should be able to use the powers of government to impose their religious views upon others.
Mitt is still supporting his buddy Richard “rape is God’s will” Mourdock.
Have you decided how you feel about this?
Have you decided whether when a woman gets raped she should be forced to have the baby?
Here is a great article from Huffington Post about how the majority of the Americans feel about that topic. See which side you are on?
*******************************************
Abortion Poll:
Vast Majority Support Legal Abortion
For Rape Victims
The vast majority of Americans believe abortion should be legal in cases of rape or incest and when the life or health of the mother is at risk, according to a new HuffPost/YouGov poll. That finding puts most Americans at odds with the 13 Republican Senate candidates who have said they support making abortion illegal in all cases.
According to the survey, at least 70 percent of respondents support keeping abortion legal for all of the three scenarios. In the individual cases, 74 percent said abortion should be legal in cases where the mother’s life is endangered by pregnancy, 70 percent said it should be legal when the mother’s health is endangered, and 74 percent said it should be legal when a woman becomes pregnant as a result of rape or incest. No more than 14 percent of respondents said that abortion should be illegal in all cases.
Those findings are similar to those of a CNN survey conducted in August, which found even higher percentages saying abortion should be legal in cases when a woman’s life was in danger (88 percent), when her health was in danger (83 percent) or when she was a victim of rape or incest (83 percent). A higher percentage of respondents to the HuffPost/YouGov poll said they were not sure, and similarly small percentage of respondents to the CNN polls said abortion should be illegal in all cases.
In the HuffPost/YouGov poll, a separate sampling found 27 percent of respondents said they believe abortion should be legal in all circumstances, 22 percent said that it should generally be legal but with some restrictions, and 30 percent said it should be illegal except in special circumstances. Fifteen percent said it should always be illegal — similar to the percentage who said abortion should be illegal even when a woman’s life or health was in danger or when she was the victim of rape or incest.
Women in the sample which asked the more general question were more likely than men to say that abortion should be legal in most or all cases — 52 percent for women versus 44 percent for men. But women asked the three questions about abortion in certain cases were less likely than men to say that abortion should be legal in those cases.
Because these questions were asked of different sets of respondents, this discrepancy could be a result of variation between the two samples, or it could be that women who oppose abortion are less likely than men to support exceptions. Women in the sample asked the more general question were more likely than men to believe abortion should be legal in all cases, but only by a one percentage point margin, which is not a large enough margin to say with certainty that this would be true of the general population, because of sampling error.
Respondents to the poll were also more likely to oppose another key aspect of social conservatives’ agenda: defunding Planned Parenthood. A 48 percent to 32 percent plurality of respondents opposed cutting federal government funding for Planned Parenthood clinics. Female respondents were more likely to oppose cutting off Planned Parenthood funding by a 27 percentage point margin, whereas for men the margin was only 5 percentage points. The survey found that more than a quarter of women (28 percent) and 10 percent of men say they’ve visited a Planned Parenthood clinic personally for health care services.
The HuffPost/YouGov poll was conducted from Oct. 26-28 among 2,000 U.S. adults using a sample drawn from YouGov’s opt-in online panel that was selected to match the demographics and other characteristics of the adult U.S. population. Factors considered include age, race, gender, education, employment, income, marital status, number of children, voter registration, time and location of Internet access, interest in politics, religion, and church attendance. The margin of error for the complete sample was 2.8 percentage points.
The questions about legality of abortion were each asked of half the sample: 999 respondents in sample A saw the question about whether abortion should generally be legal, and 1,001 respondents in sample B saw the three questions about whether abortion should be legal under specific circumstances.
First up in my final argument why you MUST NOT vote for Mitt Romney and the Republicans……Republicans hate women.
We have talked about this issue endlessly in this blog so I will just hit the high points as part of my closing argument. Republicans, driven by their extreme conservative religious views, believe that it is perfectly acceptable for them to control women and their bodies. In particular, anything related to their a woman’s reproductive system is best decided and controlled by the old, completely out of touch, men in the Republican Party.
Rape – ok because it is God’s will.
A child from Rape – God’s will and his gift to women.
“Legitimate Rape”…….(since when did any Rape become legitimate except in the mind of the Republican Party???)
Do I need to go on?
If you need more, watch this and then reconsider.
Do you want to hear from the other side of the Republican ticket? Read this from today’s Huffington Post….
Paul Ryan’s Record Opposing Abortion Rights
Back In Spotlight
Sen. Mark Warner (D-Va.) and “Fox News Sunday” host Chris Wallace argued on Sunday over GOP vice presidential nominee Paul Ryan’s position on abortion. Warner said that during Ryan’s 14 years as a Wisconsin congressman, he backed legislation that would not only ban abortion, but made no exception for pregnancies resulting from rape.
Wallace responded that Ryan supports Mitt Romney’s position on abortion, and argued that Ryan has supported exceptions to opposing abortion for “some period of time.”
Wallace: He has taken the position that Mr. Romney, which is to allow those exceptions…Warner: But Mr. Ryan’s voting record, Mr. Ryan’s voting record, Mr. Ryan’s voting record…
Wallace: Listen, Joe Biden didn’t agree, Senator Warner, with a lot of Barack Obama’s positions, but you listen to the guy in the top job.
Warner: So, Mr. Ryan has changed his positions now. I guess that’s news.
Wallace: No, actually, it has been for some period of time.
Since joining the Romney campaign, Ryan has said that Romney will “set the policy”on abortion if elected. Romney, who described himself as “pro-choice” in earlier stages of his political career, today favors a ban on abortion except in cases of rape, incest or when the pregnancy endangers the life of the mother.
But a look at Ryan’s record on abortion shows a different path. Last year, Ryan co-sponsored a bill that aimed to give fetuses “constitutional attributes and privileges” and did not include exceptions for cases of rape, incest or life-threatening pregnancies. Ryan and Rep. Todd Akin (R-Mo.), a Senate candidate who recently claimed that women’s bodies can prevent pregnancy in the event of a “legitimate rape,” were among a group of 54 co-sponsors of the bill, most of whom were male. The measure, known as the Sanctity of Human Life Act, was referred to the House Judiciary Committee and has not reached the floor for a vote.
Ryan and Akin also co-sponsored a 2011 bill identifying cases of “forcible rape” as the only exception to an existing law that witholds federal funding for abortions. Known as the No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion Act, the bill would have effectively eliminated funds for victims of statutory rape. Abortion rights advocates said the bill also would have limited the ability of women who are drugged and raped to terminate any resulting pregnancies.
The “forcible rape” language was later removed from the bill. Ryan described it as”stock language” and said in August that he agreed with its removal. In May 2011, the measure passed the House, but it is not expected to reach the Democratic-controlled Senate floor for a vote.
The National Right to Life Committee has said Ryan voted with the group on 78 abortion-related measures considered during his tenure in office. NARAL Pro-Choice America has also reviewed Ryan’s voting record and described him as uniformly opposed to abortion rights.
As of today, it is 10 days until the election. President Obama is on the campaign trail making the argument on why you need to vote for him. I am counting on him to do a good job making that argument so I am not going to spend my time repeating it.
I am going to spend the next 10 days giving my closing argument as to why you MUST NOT vote for Mitt Romney. I am going to do this by talking about the Republican 10 commandments, i.e. 10 key things that the Republicans stand for that I believe disqualify them and Mitt Romney from running this great country. I encourage you to read them, think about them, and if you agree with them share them with any friends that are still on the fence as to who they will vote for. Stay tuned….Republican Commandment #10 will be posted soon.